Home
Articles
Why We Advocate.
Educational Links
Embryonic stem cell
Stem Cells 101
Stem Cell News
Therapeutic Cloning
Hope in experimental
Guestbook
Our Position Paper.
Contact
Stem Cells
Medical Research Forum.
All About Stem Cells
All About Stem Cells PT2
All About Stem Cells PT3
All About Stem Cells PT4
All About Diabetes.
All About Cancer Part 1
All About Cancer Part 2
All About Parkinson's
Meet The President
Library
Facts & Figures
Our Programs
Stem Cell Compromise.
Stem Cell Diversification
Letters To The Editor
Epigenetics
Events
Job Opportunities.
Why Aren't We Smarter.
Ohio Weather


We have compiled letters from around the country: From the commentary pages of newspapers and magazines dealing with stem cell research.


Big Bang Theory:   Full Article


U.S. News & World Report - Tuesday, November 24, 2009 Author: Jeff Greer
The University of Nebraska's Board of Regents took a stand on a controversial issue on Friday, voting down a resolution that would have restricted the amount of stem cell research done in university facilities. The resolution, which needed five votes from the board and only got four, would have followed former President George W. Bush's guidelines for researching stem cells , the Daily Nebraskan [http://www.dailynebraskan.com/news/regents-vote-against-limiting- stem - cell - research -1.2095586] reports.

University of Nebraska's current policy follows state and federal law for the research , the report says. The current policy has the support of the school's president, who spoke against the new resolution before the regents voted last week. Student Regent Bradley Bohn tells the Daily Nebraskan that students at the Lincoln, Neb., school are "overwhelmingly in favor of continuing embryonic research ."

One regent offered a personal experience as the main reason he voted against the resolution to change the school's policy.

"I had a young neighbor, a very young neighbor, who I watched go through this until she passed away," Regent Bob Whitehouse said. "In her dying moments, she said to me, 'Bob, please continue the research .' It sticks with you. Is it one reason? Probably not. But it's compelling to an awful lot of folks with an awful lot of hope along the way."


U.S. News & World Report - Tuesday, December 01, 2009 Author: Sarah Baldauf
"I was so far down, I had to try," says Brent Benson, who entered a clinical trial last April to rejuvenate his failing heart. Stem cells were taken from the 69-year-old biochemist's hip, processed over several weeks, and pumped as 30 separate injections into parts of his heart muscle that were hibernating — not functioning well, yet not scarred and dead.

The ongoing study is one of many trials testing the ability of an adult's own stem cells — continuously produced and capable of becoming any of a range of cell types — to regenerate heart muscle and restore blood flow.

By one objective measure, Benson's heart has improved. In May, the main pumping chamber of his heart was in distress, enlarged to more than twice its normal size as it labored to compensate for its dwindling strength. Benson was fatigued and had trouble breathing. Six months later, the chamber had shrunk by a third. The heart failure label can't be discarded — Benson's heart is still weak. But he measures his improvement in his reclaimed ability to do physical work, daily at his small farm in Benjamin, Utah, and, in recent weeks, to winterize his family's summer home, some 9,000 feet above sea level.

The lure of stem cells is seductive, but harnessing their ability to take on different roles is just beginning — as is measuring their effect. Researchers often struggle to determine whether a patient's improvement can truly be attributed to a stem cell treatment. "There's such a high placebo effect," says Amit Patel, director of cardiovascular regenerative medicine at the University of Utah and lead investigator in Benson's trial. It's likely that Benson's response is real, given that he lives at such a high altitude, says Patel: "Elevation — that's the ultimate stress test."

No stem cell therapy will wipe out heart failure, experts warn. "Even as a wildly optimistic guy, I don't imagine that anything I do on a single day in the cath lab is going to reverse 30 years of disease," says Douglas Losordo, director of the cardiovascular regenerative medicine program at Northwestern University's Feinberg School of Medicine. He is leading a small heart failure pilot study using stem cells extracted from a patient's own bloodstream.

A few of the unknowns in heart failure trials include how best to deliver the stem cells to the heart, precisely where to place them, and how to keep them from moving elsewhere, as many do. Researchers are also studying which kinds of stem cells are most likely to work — those from a person's own bone marrow, blood, or the heart itself or, someday, "off the shelf" stem cells from other sources. "No evidence out there yet would point a person in one direction or another," Losordo says. It's too new.

Across the spectrum of heart failure therapies, use of stem cells "is the sexiest one," says Patel, but it's "just one component of the entire continuum." To patients with failing hearts and desperate for help, he suggests contacting a major research center that offers many weapons — from surgery to implantable devices to stem cell therapies.